A person uses AI in a proceeding. The court answers, or does not.
Canadian court and tribunal decisions in which someone used AI in a proceeding, or was said to have. Each one read in full and coded on what the decision itself says: what the adjudicator called the wrong, what the person said in reply, and what followed. Nothing is recorded unless the decision says it, and you can read the sentence that says it.
0 of 0 shown
The box searches the whole of every record rather than the case name alone: the passage,
the sentence behind each code, the account, the note, and the reason a screened-out decision was set aside.
Matches are highlighted where they fall. Try